Killing of Gray Wolves in the Rocky Mountains

Killing of Gray Wolves in the Rocky Mountains

Feb, 2008  - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
has announced new regulations that will allow states to kill gray wolves 
in the northern Rocky Mountains, despite the fact that wolves are 
currently protected under the Endangered Species Act. 
The Service says the revision allows states and tribes with approved wolf 
management plans more flexibility to manage these wolves to ensure the 
health of wild populations and herds of elk and other ungulates, as well 
as to protect private property. 
"The states have done an excellent job managing wolves, and this revision 
will provide the extra flexibility they may need to manage wolves for some 
time in the future," said Jay Slack, acting regional director for the 
Service's Mountain-Prairie Region. "Nonetheless, we will not authorize 
removal if it brings wolf populations below management population 
targets." 
Killing of wolves will not be authorized if it would contribute to 
reducing the wolf population in any state below 20 breeding pairs and 200 
total wolves, the Service said. 
The revision would enable people on private or public land to "lethally 
take a wolf that is in the act of attacking their stock animals or dogs, 
under certain circumstances." 

The action will allow the killing of all but 600 of the approximately 
1,500 wolves in the region. The rule applies to wolves in central Idaho 
and the Greater Yellowstone area - descendents of the 65 wolves that were 
reintroduced to those regions in 1995 and 1996. 
Conservationists say the rule would undo years of wolf recovery work, 
allowing states to shoot the animals while they are still under federal 
protection. 
"We've worked hard to bring wolves back from the brink of extinction," 
said Sierra Club representative Melanie Stein. "If we call open season on 
wolves now, we could soon find ourselves back at the starting line. It's a 
tremendous waste of taxpayer dollars." 
"Deer and elk populations are thriving in this region. There's absolutely 
no reason to begin slaughtering wolves, other than to please a handful of 
special interests," Stein said. "This is another example of politics 
trumping science in the Bush administration. Federal and state agencies 
are tripping over each other, and our wildlife are suffering as a result." 

These modifications would not apply to states or tribes without approved 
wolf management plans and would not impact wolves outside the Yellowstone 
or central Idaho nonessential experimental population areas or in National 
Parks. An environmental assessment has been prepared on this action and is 
available at the same website 
http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/wolf/. 
In its environmental assessment, the Service determined that controlling 
wolves to address impacts with elk and deer would not compromise recovery 
of the northern Rocky Mountain wolf. This determination is supported by 
current research on growth rates of this wolf population, wolf behavior 
and biology. 
But Suzanne Stone, northern Rockies wolf conservation specialist for 
Defenders of Wildlife calls the revision "a giant step backward." 
"Stripping away protection for our wolves is entirely unjustified," said 
Stone. "Elk and deer populations in all three northern Rockies states are 
at or near record highs, and nonlethal, proactive methods are helping to 
reduce conflicts between wolves and livestock. There is absolutely no 
reason to begin a wholesale slaughter of the region's wolves. Yet that is 
exactly what the federal government is willing to allow the states to do: 
wipe out hundreds of the wolves our nation has worked so hard to recover." 

"This is a scheme based on backdoor politics, not science, and it goes too 
far. Wolves in the northern Rockies have only recently neared a point 
where the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service could consider removing federal 
protections from them. In finalizing this rule, the Service is ignoring 
its responsibility to ensure the long-term survival of the region's wolf 
population," Stone said. 
The Service says that since 1995, only 60 wolves have been legally killed 
by private citizens in defense of their private property, or by 
shoot-on-sight permits as authorized by either the 1994 or 2005 
experimental population special rules. 
In the past 12 years, the agency says, two wolves have been taken by 
federal land permittees as wolves chased and harassed horses in corrals or 
on pickets. There have also been a few reported instances of stock animals 
being spooked by wolves. "Based on this information, the Service believes 
it is unlikely that wolf control to protect stock animals and dogs would 
meaningfully impact the wolf population." 

---